Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Ismael Valladolid Torres <ivalladt@...>

To: Bill White <bill.white@...>

Cc: Arnold Krille <arnold@...>, <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations

Date: Thursday, December 6, 2007 - 6:47 pm

--m51xatjYGsM+13rf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill White escribe:

quoted text

> True. But Inkscape is a much simpler program. It does less, so it's not=

quoted text

> confusing as the Gimp. If I had mentioned Inkscape that's what I would h=

ave

quoted text

> meant, if I ever spoke in the subjunctive mood, which I would never do.

I can't agree. Inkscape is simply designed for a completely different
task. Both Inkscape and the GIMP kick asses, each one in what it's
designed for.

Cordially, Ismael
--=20
Ismael Valladolid Torres GnuPG key: DE721AF4
Jabber: ivalladt@gmail.com
http://usuarios.lycos.es/ivalladt/ Skype: ivalladt

--m51xatjYGsM+13rf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHWEOc59Nokt5yGvQRAvKiAJ0UOMKCSzwud7iINXBgY6zyDoEHrACfaqKZ
+YhsSyxsxqRrpNI/Q/drEw4=
=wCyX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--m51xatjYGsM+13rf--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 12:16 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, thomas fisher, (Wed Dec 5, 4:27 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 4:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, David Olofson, (Wed Dec 5, 4:28 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 6:01 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Nick Copeland, (Wed Dec 5, 6:07 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 6:37 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 6:50 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 6:19 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 4:19 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 3:26 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 2:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bengt , (Wed Dec 5, 1:51 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, drew Roberts, (Wed Dec 5, 1:00 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 12:54 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Wed Dec 5, 10:08 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 5:18 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Thu Dec 6, 7:13 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 8:02 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:50 am)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 9:33 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Thu Dec 6, 6:22 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Shelagh Manton, (Fri Dec 7, 3:05 am)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 6:47 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:47 am)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Rob, (Fri Dec 7, 7:04 am)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 7:15 am)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Jan Weil, (Wed Dec 5, 12:53 pm)

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Paul Davis, (Wed Dec 5, 12:21 pm)

linuxaudio.org

Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations