Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arnold Krille <arnold@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2007 - 6:22 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Arnold Krille wrote:

True. But Inkscape is a much simpler program. It does less, so it's not as
confusing as the Gimp. If I had mentioned Inkscape that's what I would have
meant, if I ever spoke in the subjunctive mood, which I would never do.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHWD4HTi5xeapaTM0RAvt7AJ4n/yOvFvFi/j6FvpcI6N+6+HVhcACfQw+q
ip7PyUc5003WA6qqe8/DAZw=
=BagJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, thomas fisher, (Wed Dec 5, 4:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, David Olofson, (Wed Dec 5, 4:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 6:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Nick Copeland, (Wed Dec 5, 6:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 6:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 4:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 3:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bengt , (Wed Dec 5, 1:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, drew Roberts, (Wed Dec 5, 1:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 12:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Wed Dec 5, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 5:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Thu Dec 6, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 8:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:50 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Thu Dec 6, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Shelagh Manton, (Fri Dec 7, 3:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:47 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Rob, (Fri Dec 7, 7:04 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 7:15 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Jan Weil, (Wed Dec 5, 12:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Paul Davis, (Wed Dec 5, 12:21 pm)