Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, December 6, 2007 - 5:18 pm

--nextPart1354562.PmkAp14yfl
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Am Mittwoch, 5. Dezember 2007 schrieb david:

be

After saving to a pixel-based format (and I believe that dave means=20
pixel-based when he talks about images) that advantage becomes nill. And gi=
mp=20
afaik uses the same font-engine as inkscape to render text. And yes, inksca=
pe=20
renders text! To screen and to the exported pixmap/image...

Arnold
=2D-=20
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
=2D--
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send=
me=20
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your=20
administrator to do so...

--nextPart1354562.PmkAp14yfl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBHWC66uYLL1cDjHx0RAhPdAJ9nbUtyF/r/6taoCddfDr9IrvkISgCfTeq0
mM5wJrnREoQssR/uHEdD524=
=npv6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1354562.PmkAp14yfl--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, thomas fisher, (Wed Dec 5, 4:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, David Olofson, (Wed Dec 5, 4:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 6:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Nick Copeland, (Wed Dec 5, 6:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 6:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 4:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 3:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bengt , (Wed Dec 5, 1:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, drew Roberts, (Wed Dec 5, 1:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 12:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Wed Dec 5, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 5:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Thu Dec 6, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 8:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:50 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Thu Dec 6, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Shelagh Manton, (Fri Dec 7, 3:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:47 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Rob, (Fri Dec 7, 7:04 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 7:15 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Jan Weil, (Wed Dec 5, 12:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Paul Davis, (Wed Dec 5, 12:21 pm)