Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Chuckk Hubbard <badmuthahubbard@...>, David Olofson <david@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, December 5, 2007 - 6:07 pm

--_2741f7ff-9963-4cf9-bd33-be1aecee3d4d_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> > The main thing I notice is that I can't select any other layers until> =
I anchor the new one...
The layers are like transparencies - you can only paint on to the top trans=
parency. If you want to do stuff without anchoring them down then you need =
to raise or lower them accordingly from the Layers menu.
_________________________________________________________________
Discover the new Windows Vista
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=3Dwindows+vista&mkt=3Den-US&form=3D...
E=

--_2741f7ff-9963-4cf9-bd33-be1aecee3d4d_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}

> > The main thing I notice is that I can't select any other =
layers until> I anchor the new one...
The layers are like transparencies - you can only paint on to the top trans=
parency. If you want to do stuff without anchoring them down then you need =
to raise or lower them accordingly from the Layers menu.Dis=
cover the new Windows Vista Learn more!
=

--_2741f7ff-9963-4cf9-bd33-be1aecee3d4d_--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 12:16 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, thomas fisher, (Wed Dec 5, 4:27 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 4:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, David Olofson, (Wed Dec 5, 4:28 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Chuckk Hubbard, (Wed Dec 5, 6:01 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Nick Copeland, (Wed Dec 5, 6:07 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 6:37 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 6:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 6:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Lars Luthman, (Wed Dec 5, 4:19 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Wed Dec 5, 3:26 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Dave Phillips, (Wed Dec 5, 2:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bengt , (Wed Dec 5, 1:51 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, drew Roberts, (Wed Dec 5, 1:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Wed Dec 5, 12:54 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Wed Dec 5, 10:08 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 5:18 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Thu Dec 6, 7:13 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Arnold Krille, (Thu Dec 6, 8:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:50 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 9:33 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Bill White, (Thu Dec 6, 6:22 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Shelagh Manton, (Fri Dec 7, 3:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Ismael Valladolid Torres, (Thu Dec 6, 6:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 6:47 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Rob, (Fri Dec 7, 7:04 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, david, (Fri Dec 7, 7:15 am)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Jan Weil, (Wed Dec 5, 12:53 pm)
Re: [LAU] [OT] gimp frustrations, Paul Davis, (Wed Dec 5, 12:21 pm)