agreed, though the conversation itself was useful, the prokeys88 is hardly =
a
decent example. I hadn't heard about it until this thread and this morning
I saw one on display at guitar center. The keys were mush and it sounded
like any typical 'softsynth wrapped by some plastic'.
-brad
On Dec 4, 2007 9:26 AM, Michal Seta wrote:
> > > Le Dimanche, 02 D=E9cembre 2007 15:53:30 +0000,
agreed, though the conversation itself was useful, the prokeys88 is hardly =
a decent example. I hadn't heard about it until this thread and t=
his morning I saw one on display at guitar center. The keys wer=
e mush and it sounded like any typical 'softsynth wrapped by some plast=
ic'.
-bradOn Dec 4, 2007 9:26 AM,=
Michal Seta <mis@artengine.ca&g=
t; wrote:
000,> > Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@gjcp.net> a =E9crit :> > > You still haven&=
#39;t posted a sample of it.
That particular patch (that Ianas finds so rich) can be heard=
here:http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/ProKeys88-main=
.html demo patch number 12.To me it sounds like strings sampl=
es with slow attack throughchorus+reverb and a bit of low pass filterin=
g.So I think that all the talk about swsynths vs. hwsynths is irrelevan=
t
as this particular instrument seems to be sample-based. I guess i=
tcould very easily be achieved with fluidsynth (loaded with a decentsoundfont) and optionally jack-rack with a couple of LADSPA plugins.
I really don't see what the fuss is all about.Cheers../=
MiS______________________________=
_________________Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.orghttp://lists.=
linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user