Re: [LAU] Software or performance?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, December 3, 2007 - 8:29 pm

On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:04:35 +0100
Simon Edwards wrote:

> Hi,

Thanks everybody for your suggestions.

It looks like the general consensus is to regard these as code. This is
also the opinion of Miguel who made the original query. I particularly
like the suggestion that Zyn. is the 'interpreter' of the program, and
to whoever it was that asked, yes banks files are XML. Also, in the
same way that a hardware synth makes no claims on the music produced
with it, I don't think there could be any contention here.

Unless I hear an irrefutable objection, I'll put my work under GPL V 2
or later and put the appropriate message in the zip file.

With that said, some of my patches are based on work by others
including Paul. I will check with these people and remove any from my
collection that are objected to.

--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Software or performance?, Folderol, (Sat Dec 1, 8:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Simon Edwards, (Sun Dec 2, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Folderol, (Mon Dec 3, 8:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Robert Persson, (Tue Dec 11, 11:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Mark Constable, (Sun Dec 2, 5:56 am)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, drew Roberts, (Sun Dec 2, 1:53 am)