Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dominic Sacré <dominic.sacre@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, December 17, 2007 - 12:24 am

------=_Part_4211_7996905.1197851034460
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

i'd love to see this integrated with ardour's upcoming midi support :) the
momentum of oss development is ever increasing :)

porl

On 17/12/2007, Dominic Sacr=E9 wrote:

o
t
g
t

------=_Part_4211_7996905.1197851034460
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

i'd love to see this integrated with ardour's upcoming midi support=
:) the momentum of oss development is ever increasing :)porlOn 17/12/2007,
Dominic Sacr=E9 <dominic.sac=
re@gmx.de
> wrote:
On Sunday 16 December 2007 21:13:56 Ken Restivo wrote:> > I agree=
, a proper user interface is really needed. You shouldn't have to&g=
t; > restart the program just to change the tempo...> > My own=
priority at the moment would be a GTK frontend, but I'll try to

well. Thanks for your> > feedback, I'll keep you posted!=
like mplayer
step the tempo, for instance, / and * or> up-arrow/down-arrow to rai=
se and lower volume, etc.That's the idea... In addition to the =
GUI, of course.
emester C> course. In fact, if klick was in C and not C++, I'd a=
lready have done it> and submitted a patch. But OOP still seems alie=
n to me, so after looking at
be a little more involved than that, because klick, as it isnow, is ent=
irely designed around tempo maps. They are loaded at startup, and
not meant to be modified at runtime. So that will have to change, too..=
.Dominic_______________________________________________=
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mai=
lman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

------=_Part_4211_7996905.1197851034460--

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Mon Dec 3, 12:50 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Matthias , (Wed Jan 23, 9:25 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Thu Jan 24, 1:35 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Matthias , (Thu Jan 24, 9:05 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Sun Jan 27, 11:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Matthias , (Mon Dec 3, 1:52 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Ken Restivo, (Thu Dec 6, 4:55 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Thu Dec 6, 6:04 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Loki Davison, (Wed Dec 12, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Julien Claassen, (Wed Dec 12, 5:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Thu Dec 13, 12:26 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Ken Restivo, (Sun Dec 16, 8:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic , (Sun Dec 16, 11:24 pm)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, porl sheean, (Mon Dec 17, 12:24 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Geoff Beasley, (Thu Dec 13, 12:30 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Dominic Sacré, (Mon Dec 3, 10:54 am)
Re: [LAU] [ANN] klick 0.5, Julien Claassen, (Mon Dec 3, 12:54 am)