[LAU] Software or performance?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Saturday, December 1, 2007 - 8:47 pm

For those who don't know, for some time I've made available all the
voice patches I've created for ZynAddSubFX.

However, for the first time I've been asked what license they are
under, which presents a curious problem.

Would these be best regarded as 'software'? - in which case I'd go for
GPL2 or later, or are they more like a 'performance'? - where I would
then go for creative commons BY-SA

I'd be interested in peoples opinions.

--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Software or performance?, Folderol, (Sat Dec 1, 8:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Simon Edwards, (Sun Dec 2, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Folderol, (Mon Dec 3, 8:29 pm)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Robert Persson, (Tue Dec 11, 11:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, Mark Constable, (Sun Dec 2, 5:56 am)
Re: [LAU] Software or performance?, drew Roberts, (Sun Dec 2, 1:53 am)