>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:38:03 +0100 (CET)
> 1. .html-files: I meant instead of simple ftp-site have .html-files with
ahh.... that's what i was missing -- the concept of including files from other locations. makes good sense.
> 2. MIDI: I didn't mean sending in MIDI-tracks as real treacks. Just as a
ok, that's probably workable, although i'd probably render an audio track, at least for my personal consumption. ;-)
> 3. About the looser: I know we wouldn't loose anything really. But Frank
yes, multi-server again. and the only other caveat i would insert is that there are likely to be a bunch of tracks NOBODY wants in the end, so there's no point including that hifi content in your "ALL, REALLY ALL". i'd say hifi content should be on a request basis -- i.e. the default is to always minimize bandwidth, until anyone needs to make a high-quality mix including any track.
Linux-audio-user mailing list