Subject: Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?

From: plutek-infinity <plutek@...> · Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 - 10:21 pm

>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:38:03 +0100 (CET)

quoted text>From: Julien Claassen 
>  1. .html-files: I meant instead of simple ftp-site have .html-files with

quoted text>lists. So you can easily include files from othe sites/servers.
ahh.... that's what i was missing -- the concept of including files from other locations. makes good sense.
>  2. MIDI: I didn't mean sending in MIDI-tracks as real treacks. Just as a

quoted text>possibility for the starter track. The monitor, if you like.
ok, that's probably workable, although i'd probably render an audio track, at least for my personal consumption.  ;-)
>  3. About the looser: I know we wouldn't loose anything really. But Frank

quoted text>Pirrone suggested only uploading the "winning" tracks in hifi-quality. that I

>didn't like to much. I just meant: We could still have ALL, REALLY ALL, tracks

>in hifi-quality, if we can distribute them. I think the greatest problem, that

>Frank correctly saw, is bandwidth. But with multi-server distribution, the

>problem is'nt anymore.
yes, multi-server again. and the only other caveat i would insert is that there are likely to be a bunch of tracks NOBODY wants in the end, so there's no point including that hifi content in your "ALL, REALLY ALL". i'd say hifi content should be on a request basis -- i.e. the default is to always minimize bandwidth, until anyone needs to make a high-quality mix including any track.
--

.pltk.

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-user mailing list

Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user