Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, November 16, 2007 - 5:27 am

On 2007-11-16 03:03 pm, Frank Pirrone wrote:

Storage is not an issue but bandwidth always is.

> This is absolutely NOT the way to construct a song through on-line

I totally agree. There are at least 3 levels of involvement,

a) anything light and simple to initially define a song, proof
of concept songs only have to be MIDI tracks, using say the
fluidr2 soundfont, along with live medium-fi vorbis tracks

anyone gets to play on this level, even via 56k dialup from
Nigeria (ooh, bad example)

b) a semi-pro final mix using flac'd 16bit/44.1khtz audio
tracks and as many MIDI tracks that can be rendered to 16/44
locally (without requiring any transfer of large wavs)

a bit of a compromise but I'm sure the end result could be
quite satisfactory, and so so much Better Than Nothing

c) if a song, or piece, passes both the previous levels and is
deemed worthy of super-pro mastering then those intimately
involved with the piece can make their own arrangments to
deal with transferring 32bit/96khtz master tracks to wherever
is going to do the final mix(s) and perhaps use archive.org
to hold the complete final master mix components

I'd be impressed if I ever see a LAU based a) let alone a b).

A c) by the end of the decade would be too cool.

And just as a note, I am personally interested in GPL-like
songs where the components that went into making the song are
also available somewhere, hence the idea of using Subversion
to deal with some, or even all, parts of a song and indeed it's
entire life cycle of evolvement can be logged and this creative
outline or path is ALSO of great interest to me. A bunch of
guys using collab in "secret" and suddenly releasing a final
mastered ogg to listen to is of little interest to me. How a
song is created with access to the digital parts that make it
up is what I find the most exciting part of this discussion.

Oh, and actually listening to something, as well, would be
kinda cool too :-)

--markc

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Nov 15, 12:10 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, drew Roberts, (Thu Nov 15, 12:45 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Nov 15, 5:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 1:37 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Nov 16, 2:57 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 4:56 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Nov 16, 2:07 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 4:43 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 7:11 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 11:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Julien Claassen, (Fri Nov 16, 9:06 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Sat Nov 17, 12:29 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 9:32 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Julien Claassen, (Fri Nov 16, 9:38 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 10:21 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Julien Claassen, (Fri Nov 16, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Folderol, (Fri Nov 16, 9:50 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Paul Davis, (Fri Nov 16, 4:08 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Kevin Cosgrove, (Tue Nov 27, 2:51 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Dave Phillips, (Tue Nov 27, 9:36 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Tue Nov 27, 10:30 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Tue Nov 27, 11:03 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Geoff Beasley, (Wed Nov 28, 12:44 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 6:14 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Rob, (Fri Nov 16, 2:02 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 5:31 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, drew Roberts, (Sat Nov 17, 5:33 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Rob, (Fri Nov 16, 7:15 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Sat Nov 17, 12:02 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Kevin Cosgrove, (Sat Nov 24, 11:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, david, (Sat Nov 17, 8:22 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Sat Nov 17, 12:09 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Sat Nov 17, 1:17 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Sat Nov 17, 12:36 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Fri Nov 16, 7:19 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Thu Nov 15, 6:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 1:38 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Ken Restivo, (Thu Nov 15, 9:42 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 12:13 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Julien Claassen, (Fri Nov 16, 10:48 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 12:49 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 1:44 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Mark Constable, (Fri Nov 16, 5:27 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 5:09 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Folderol, (Fri Nov 16, 7:00 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, plutek-infinity, (Fri Nov 16, 2:53 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Frank Pirrone, (Fri Nov 16, 5:20 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Nov 16, 3:00 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Patrick Shirkey, (Fri Nov 16, 3:32 am)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Julien Claassen, (Thu Nov 15, 6:34 pm)
Re: [LAU] LAU collaboration coordination?, Julien Claassen, (Thu Nov 15, 12:08 pm)