Re: [LAU] Re: difference between realtime-kernel and low-latency-kernel?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2007 - 10:27 am

Hi,

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:

Hmmm, POSIX talks about priorities in the range of
min .. max,
where
min = sched_get_priority_min(alg)
max = sched_get_priority_max(alg)
max - min >= 32, if alg == SCHED_FIFO or alg == SCHED_RR
and alg being the the scheduling algorithm (like SCHED_FIFO, ...)

Under Linux (according to 'man sched_get_priority_min') the follwoing
ranges apply:
SCHED_FIFO : min = 1, max = 99
SCHED_RR : min = 1, max = 99
SCHED_OTHER : min = 0, max = 0

jm5c,

Yours,

Jacob

>

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAU] Re: difference between realtime-kernel and low-latency..., Kjetil S. Matheussen, (Wed Oct 3, 10:46 pm)
Re: [LAU] Re: difference between realtime-kernel and low-lat..., Jacob, (Thu Oct 4, 10:27 am)