linuxaudio.org

--- Patrick Shirkey

wrote:
> R Parker wrote:

quoted text
> >

> > How do think the owners of GPL licensed software

> will

> > feel when this behaviour you subscribe to becomes

> the

> > norm for their source code? What distinguishes a

> DJ

> > from the person who violates those rights?

> >

>

> GPL anything can be freely remixed. What's your

> point?

The GPL defines a set of rights. What happens when I

violate those rights? You claim it's OK to violate the

rights of the copyright owner for music. What is the

difference? Why is it OK to violate a musicians rights

but not OK to violate a software developers rights?
Ron Parker

Mirror Image Studio
> >> the liklihood of that happening around here is

quoted text
> slim

> >> to non existant.

> >>

> >> So, If you are going to complain every time a DJ

> >> makes a remix

> >

> > Please don't use a personal attacks when debating

> with

> > me.

> >

>

> HuH?

>

> > There is a system in place that enables you to use

> > property that other people own the rights to. Be

> > responsible and learn to use it.

> >

> > There's plenty I'd like to say but ironically

> enough I

> > have a session with a DJ for whom we wrote the

> beats.

> > It'll go about six or eight hours. Maybe I'll

> check in

> > later to see what's up. Maybe I won't.

> >

>

> Up to you.

>

>

> --

> Patrick Shirkey - Boost Hardware Ltd.

> Http://www.boosthardware.com

> Http://lau.linuxaudio.org - The Linux Audio Users

> guide

> ========================================

>

> "Anything your mind can see you can manifest

> physically, then it will

> become reality" - Macka B

>

> 

__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

http://mail.yahoo.com