Loki Davison wrote:
> ARRG you used the bad words!!!! AMS?
I agree that AMS is buggy, and that om in many ways are better. But I
must admit that I found AMS even more fun/easy to work with than om. Esp
if you stick to the build-in modules in AMS, the modules work together
really smoothly. I know that defect, no-common-conventions, generic
interfaces LADSPA plugins isn't om's fault, but it's still part of the
But of course the buggyness and fact that it's unmaintained makes AMS
totally unusable for me too.
peace, love & harmony