linuxaudio.org

Loki Davison wrote:
> ARRG you used the bad words!!!! AMS?
I agree that AMS is buggy, and that om in many ways are better. But I

must admit that I found AMS even more fun/easy to work with than om. Esp

if you stick to the build-in modules in AMS, the modules work together

really smoothly. I know that defect, no-common-conventions, generic

interfaces LADSPA plugins isn't om's fault, but it's still part of the

user-experience.
But of course the buggyness and fact that it's unmaintained makes AMS

totally unusable for me too.
--

peace, love & harmony

Atte
http://www.atte.dk      | quartet:      http://www.anagrammer.dk

http://www.atte.dk/gps  | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions