Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency

Date: Monday, April 10, 2006 - 10:08 pm

Adrien DANIEL wrote:

quoted text

> Hello !
>
> I am a lot interested by the Edirol UA-25. I think I will buy it ! :)
> But before, I would like to know if some of you have tried it, have
> known issues with it or not, were or were not able to get a low-latency
> with JACK (64, 32 or 16 frames/period)... etc...
>
> Thank you very much to share your experience with me, I need feedbacks
> as soon as possible !

It's been fine for me so far (reliable enough for gigs). Jack latency
is 10.6ms, can't remember the frames/period for that off the top of my
head. The response is fast enough for keyboard playing and live input
processing. To get that without xruns I had to use a fully-preemptible
kernel. I'd recommend it for getting sound in and out a laptop.

--
Jonny

Music - http://jeremah.co.uk
News - http://voxpolis.com

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Mon Apr 10, 9:51 pm)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Jonny Stutters, (Mon Apr 10, 10:08 pm)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Mon Apr 10, 10:23 pm)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Christoph Eckert, (Mon Apr 10, 10:36 pm)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Cesare Marilungo, (Mon Apr 10, 11:32 pm)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Tue Apr 11, 8:22 am)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Christoph Eckert, (Mon Apr 10, 10:20 pm)

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Mon Apr 10, 10:28 pm)

linuxaudio.org

Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency