Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, April 10, 2006 - 10:08 pm

Adrien DANIEL wrote:

It's been fine for me so far (reliable enough for gigs). Jack latency
is 10.6ms, can't remember the frames/period for that off the top of my
head. The response is fast enough for keyboard playing and live input
processing. To get that without xruns I had to use a fully-preemptible
kernel. I'd recommend it for getting sound in and out a laptop.

--
Jonny

Music - http://jeremah.co.uk
News - http://voxpolis.com

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Mon Apr 10, 9:51 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Jonny Stutters, (Mon Apr 10, 10:08 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Mon Apr 10, 10:23 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Christoph Eckert, (Mon Apr 10, 10:36 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Cesare Marilungo, (Mon Apr 10, 11:32 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Tue Apr 11, 8:22 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Christoph Eckert, (Mon Apr 10, 10:20 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Edirol UA-25 and low-latency, Adrien DANIEL, (Mon Apr 10, 10:28 pm)