Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 5, 2005 - 8:15 pm

Carotinho wrote:

> But I need your knowledge, and I don't know where else to ask!:)

It depends on the music and the venue. If possible, using amplifiers
for the guitar and bass is more ideal -- the musicians will have more
control over their sound and not have to rely on the sound person, and
this is a good thing. It also depends on how powerful your PA is... to
get a good bass sound through a PA, you will need to push the PA up
pretty hot, and it can easily overdrive the speakers.

(BTW, I am a lead guitarist so I am speaking from this POV)

> - What's the difference between having a cable from the electric guitar

A lot! Using a microphone picks up the sound of the amplifier much
better, especially coupled with with room acoustics and the speaker
cabinet. A lot of the sound of the amp comes from the speaker (or
speakers), and guitarists in particular are picky about the speakers in
their amps -- using the line out of the amp bypasses the speaker and yo
just get the raw sound, whihc can be somewhat harsh and without a lot of
presence.

The same may go for basses also...

Now, some musicians use modeling equipment, like the PODxt series, which
do a fairly decent job of emulating amp/speaker/microphone combinations
and you can use those direct into the board (although experience has
shown it still isn't as good as a real amp -- I use one myself, and
bypass the cabinet/mike emulation).

> - Since I believe we wont' have proper drums mic, but only a panoramic one

You mean an omnidirectional versus cardioid? Miking drums is an art
itself, and unless you are in a large hall or recording, miking the
drums is not usually necessary. There are customized kits for miking
drums, and they have specialized mikes for the kick, snare, etc.

You'll just have to experiment with the mikes you have if you really
want to use them for getting the drum into the PA. Two dynamic mikes
placed up high over the left and right of the kit is a start...

> - The mixer has for every channel a Canon or alternatively a Jack input.

Canon input? Jack input? Usually, the mixer will have a microphone
(low-level --> mike pre-amp, this is usually a three-prong XLR) and a
line-level input (1/4" jack). Some mixers may have two mike inputs, one
is balanced (XLR) and one is unbalanced. You really need to refer to
your mixer documentation for the details.

Some mixers also have inserts, which can be used for external
processers, like perhaps a compressor for vocals.

> 2) Another job I have to do is to record a wind band playing live (40 players,

I'd get a better soundcard...

I recently recorded several bands live using two dynamic mikes placed to
the left and right and somewhat behind the audience, going into a small
pre-amp and then into a dedicated DAT deck. We miked everything
(including the drums) to ensure we got a good mix out of the PA, and the
recording came out *fantastic* -- far better than what our soundperson
had gotten recording directly from the mixer. I am taking the DAT
digital out and then transferring to the hard drive via Ardour, for
editing and then through Jamin for pre-mastering.

> - Apart from trying to avoid clipping when recording, do I need to set some

Depends on what you have on-hand for recording. I tend to record
everything flat and tweak it in post.

> - Which settings should I use for recording? I mean, 48Khz, 32 bit float, or

Also depends on what you've got on hand. Does SBLIve support 48kHz
recording?

> I wonder if it's worth trying recording also the rock band, without a

You can do it live, but if you want a studio recording, you will want to
go with multi-track recording (using Ardour).

-- Brett
-----------
Programmer by day, Guitarist by Night
http://www.chapelperilous.net
http://www.alhazred.com
http://www.revelmoon.com

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-audio-user] More Homemade Music, Neal Otto Spaulding, (Sun Jul 3, 6:35 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration (was: More Homemade...), Burkhard Woelfel, (Thu Jul 28, 10:31 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Mark Constable, (Thu Jul 7, 7:16 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Mario Lang, (Thu Jul 7, 6:55 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Frank smith, (Thu Jul 7, 6:32 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Steve D, (Mon Jul 4, 5:26 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Florian Schmidt, (Mon Jul 4, 5:49 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Thorsten Wilms, (Mon Jul 4, 8:53 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Collaboration, Thorsten Wilms, (Tue Jul 5, 8:28 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Paul Winkler, (Tue Jul 5, 11:20 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Frode Haugsgjerd, (Tue Jul 5, 8:43 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Sampo Savolainen, (Tue Jul 5, 9:10 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Brett McCoy, (Tue Jul 5, 8:15 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Frode Haugsgjerd, (Tue Jul 5, 8:51 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Timothy Alan Gorman, (Mon Jul 11, 7:08 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Russell Hanaghan, (Mon Jul 11, 7:40 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] [OT] Sound service and recording, Shayne O'Connor, (Tue Jul 5, 11:20 pm)
[linux-audio-user] Re: Sound service and recording, Arnold Krille, (Tue Jul 5, 10:47 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: Sound service and recording, Brett McCoy, (Tue Jul 5, 11:53 pm)