Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, June 19, 2005 - 9:19 pm

On Sun, 2005-06-19 at 13:16 -0700, Erik Steffl wrote:

That's why I said "seems", I haven't looked closely. But historically
bloat and excessive OO-ness have gone hand in hand. I don't want this
to turn into a C vs C++ thread, besides the most bloated program on my
desktop (Evolution) is written in C, using an object oriented design.

> and yes, latest development (dmix) goes in that direction but it's

This could have been working everywhere a year ago if the distros had
pushed for it at all. dmix was presented at *last year's* LAC for
crying out loud, but not even SuSE pushed for it until a few months ago.
It would have given them a big advantage over other distros too. Maybe
they all just had bigger fish to fry.

Lee

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio simply suck ?, Kjetil Svalastog Matheussen <k.s.matheussen@notam02.no>..., (Sun Jun 19, 5:20 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: What parts of Linux audio simply ..., Lee Revell, (Sun Jun 19, 9:19 pm)