Re: [linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 - 9:56 pm

> > Steve, there is actually a glitch in time when you main bypass.

Steve, it's a glitch in _time_, it's clearly audible (CVS from just
now). To nail it down I did

jack_metro -b 120 -> jamin -> ardour (set tempo to 120)

and recorded a track of it, like 4 beats non-bypassed, 4 beats
bypassed ... Visually aligned the non-bypassed beats with Ardour's
beatlines. It's clearly visible too: The bypassed beats are ~1800
frames early.

So, this is no drama, really. But you say there should be no such thing
and that we cannot have, now can we :?


Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback, Aaron Trumm, (Mon Mar 28, 10:19 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] repost: curious about jamin feedback, Wolfgang Woehl, (Wed Mar 30, 9:56 pm)