linuxaudio.org

S. Massy wrote:
> That's it; you, guys, convinced me to have another go at csound.
Make sure to ask again, either here, on the csound list or to me offlist

if you need some pointers. I could throw a bunch of links at you, but

figure it's better you say what you need when you need it. I might not

be able to answer your question if you're trying to do things I've never

done, but for getting-starting-stuff, I could do ok. Besides that the

csound list if very friendly, knowing and frequented.
 > Lately,

quoted text
> I've been playing with ChucK and liking it a lot, because it's rather

> simple to use and understand (especially for someone who's only

> done a bit of C here, a bit of PERL there, and mostly shell scripting in

> between); but i find the language is perhaps lacking in maturity at this

> point. Also, it's well documented and provides many simple examples, but

> not many concrete, real-life examples. Still, I would say ChucK is one

> language to keep one's eyes on...

Yeah, it's syntax makes any java/C programmer feel at home. At this

point csound differs a bit. But familiar syntax will only take you so

far. Mostly I feel csound is more to the point and straight-ahead. That

said complex concepts seldom could be implemented in un-complex code.

Chuck is mostly concerned with on-the-fly (or live) programming, which

is cleanly supported in chuck but tricky/impossible to do in csound. But

if (and you hinted at that yourself) you're more interrested in making a

midi-controllable setup for realtime usage, I find csound easier to work

with.
> So far, the only

quoted text
> modular synth I found which could be accessed from the command-line is

> Om, but that involves using OSC, and would probably require me to write

> a little front-end for it, which I might or might not do, depending on

> how much time I have...

Speaking of om: Om is extremely nice, fast to work with, and uses gui in

a way that really makes sense. The fact that om uses ladspa plugins for

almost everything means that the speed of om is the speed of the

plugins. So although this actually has nothing to do with om, csound is

able to squeeze more out of my cpu. When om and (mostly) ladspa matures

this will for sure be a killer combo. Different from csound, but never

the less a killer combo.
--

peace, love & harmony

Atte
http://www.atte.dk