linuxaudio.org

I. I. Ooisen wrote:
>>    I'm not a good music reader nor writer,but when i need it Is

quoted text
>>faster for me to write by hand.

>>

>>

>

>why, do you write it in adobe? :D))

>

>

>

>

 Sorry my english is too much poor to understand this,I mean paper and

pencil :\

>>Last night I was playing with it and trying to

quoted text
>>find the way to have a "normal" view (for me) of the score.Im

>>accustomed to the real book,and I like to write my scores  in that

>>way,simple melody line and chords over,each line divided in four

>>bars,to have a clear preview of what I'm writing and  reading,but

>>have not succes.This is not the first time I find  this issue,and

>>probably the main cause,between others with no direct relationship

>>with noteedit,that made me reject the use and more extensive test of

>>the program.

>>

>>

>

>finale has a reputation for having (at least in its first versions) the

>most idiotic, un-intuitive, and frustrating interface in the history of

>software. believe me.

>

>

  I believe you,I don't know Finale.

>don't compare noteedit with finale.

quoted text
>

 I didn't,I only name it in my post because  here,

http://rnvs.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de/~jan/noteedit/noteedit.html

 that is in the open post  of this thread , is named as part of the

reason of the discontinuation of the project.

> they are conceived differently.

quoted text
>noteedit is more like "nwc" ("noteworthy composer") for windows, which

>is a much friendlier design.

>

>

    Don't know  nwc,neither.Does it have the feature to see  the sheet

as a "normal" paper,and not one line only?

>just try noteworthy composer (for windows, not gpl), and you'll see what

quoted text
>i mean. then try NOTEEDIT.

>

>

    Ok, goin to be difficult  presently as  I don't use windows

anymore,but if I got the chance,I will.
  Saludos
  --Carlos.