linuxaudio.org

Hi Brad,
> > > I'm getting 5.8 msec latency in JACK with 128

quoted text
> frames/period at 44100 and

> > > 2 periods/buffer. A huge improvement over the

> 46.1 msec using RH9 with

> > > capabilities.

I'm confused. jackstart -R -p512 -dalsa -dhw:0 -r44100

-p128 -n2 is 5.8 msec of latency and it can't be

anything else. The issue is whether or not the system

will perform reliably with these settings.
I was misinterpreting your statements. You couldn't

reliably run 128 frames with with RH9 and 2.4 kernel.

Is that correct? Doh, I went and deleted the rest of

your message--the improved low buffer size reliability

is in a FC2/2.6 kernel?
Have you done any tests with Ardour and JAMin at 128

frames?
Well, those are encouraging improvements.
With my setup, I'm getting decent enough reliability

at 128 frames but when I record and mix, I turn it

back to 1024. Under no circumstances can I tolerate a

single xrun.
ron
__________________________________

Do you Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out!

http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail