Re: [linux-audio-user] All-Soft audio question

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Friday, April 30, 2004 - 3:18 am


I think there's a clue here :-)

On Friday 30 April 2004 02:23, Malcolm Baldridge wrote:

I suggest that Aaron ties a little bit of string to his little finger with a
label on it marked 'Gentoo' and Imagines the X display with fluxbox running
on it. Perhaps the sample rate conversions could be acheived by representing
the samples bitwise in say, peaches and converting to grapes for higher
bitrates, possibly using raisins for compressed formats? The kernels in this
case would then be redundant hardware. Doing this wirelessly wouldn't be a

It might be possible to replace the server with a single block of expanded
polyeurethane, for an entirely 'soft' computerless solution };-)


tim hall

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-audio-user] All-Soft audio question, Aaron Trumm, (Fri Apr 30, 12:01 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] All-Soft audio question, Malcolm Baldridge, (Fri Apr 30, 1:30 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] All-Soft audio question, tim hall, (Fri Apr 30, 3:18 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] All-Soft audio question, Malcolm Baldridge, (Fri Apr 30, 6:32 am)