Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>, <davidrclark@...>
Date: Friday, March 26, 2004 - 4:09 am

At Wed, 24 Mar 2004 16:23:35 -0800, wrote:

Methinks this is a perfect defitition.


I think Samplers can be used in two ways:

1) To emulate "real" instruments

2) To noodle around

Instrument emulation is traditionally the domain of SoundFonts, which
is just a collection of samples and some data on how they should be
used. Using SoundFonts is pretty swell. Grab a soundfont player like
fluidsynth and keep trying soundfonts until you find one you like. If
all you ever want to do is have the best spitting image of a violin
modern synthesis can provide, this is the way to go.

For point number 2, I think SoundFonts suck arse. This is
where "traditional" samplers are cool. The creative process
goes something like this, for me:

1) Load a sample your familiar with, and put together a melody.

2) Walk through your massive library of samples and try different

3) Experiment with effects, modulation, and regurgitation until
you've got what can be objectively deemed a Cool Sound.


This depends on whether you're trying to achieve goal number 1 or 2.
For number 1, just get a good SoundFont of whatever instrument you're
trying to model (this is really easy if you're willing to pay). For
number 2, there's generally no escaping the time drain. Since you
have so much sound sculpting power at your disposal, you'll inevitably
end up spending as much time creating sounds as you will orchestrating
your song.

The rule of thumb is that Using is time-cheap, whereas Creating is

> Build a font and play something. (Specimen by Pete Bessman can be

This is actually something I had never considered when creating
Specimen; that is, providing an alternative to soundfonts. However,
it seems to be working out rather well (thanks for the plug, Dave).
One word of caution: don't try to "stretch" a sample beyond one octave
if you're aiming for realism. That is, don't up-pitch it or
down-pitch it by more than one octave (and purists will tell you that
you shouldn't up-pitch it at all). Dave doesn't have to worry about
this because he has written software to generate, say, 127 different
samples of a physically-modeled instrument. He also has scripts to
automate the creation of Specimen bank files from these samples (I'm
looking into making this easier to do with Specimen proper).


(...specimen's author...)

(...which, by the by, is available at

( might also consider checking out my competition:


Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Chris Metzler, (Fri Mar 26, 6:27 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Mark Knecht, (Fri Mar 26, 6:41 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Pete Bessman, (Fri Mar 26, 4:09 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Chris Metzler, (Fri Mar 26, 7:19 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Pete Bessman, (Sat Mar 27, 7:42 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Jesse Chappell, (Mon Mar 29, 3:53 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Pete Bessman, (Tue Mar 30, 12:19 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Beginner sampler questions, Jack O'Quin, (Tue Mar 30, 1:20 am)
[linux-audio-user] Sample search, Mark Constable, (Fri Mar 26, 6:55 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Sample search, Free Ekanayaka, (Mon Mar 29, 5:36 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] Sample search, Chris Metzler, (Fri Mar 26, 7:33 pm)