Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning Program or wav files?]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Sunday, December 19, 2004 - 4:56 pm

MarC wrote:

> En/na LinuxMedia ha escrit:

Lets see if we can start another semi useless string of which guitarists
the world over can nit pick! :)

Fact is, it is impossible to tune an acoustic guitar
"perfectly"...Invariably, when you have it tuned so an open G chord
sounds spot on, an open A or even C will be a tad off. And the same
applies to the inverse of course. This all due to a general lack of
adjustment for intonation on acoustic axes. But to the untuned ear
(which I agree in sort...should be the final judge of how your axe is
"tuned" ) this is not really noticeble.

"don't let a hacker tune your guitar!" Now that's a great line! :)
Although I'm not quite of the same ilk on this point (ergo...B52's Rock
lobster 4 string special) and an untuned instrument of ~any~ sort will
usually cause demons to appear in my personality and require excorcism
if not remedied, if it is the missing "glue" to your music..... ~enjoy~

R~

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-audio-user] Tuning Program or wav files?, LinuxMedia, (Sun Dec 19, 5:47 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning ..., Russell Hanaghan, (Sun Dec 19, 4:56 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread [WAS: Tuning ..., Christoph Eckert, (Mon Dec 20, 12:20 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Anderson, (Sun Dec 19, 9:29 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Check, (Tue Dec 21, 7:18 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Russell Hanaghan, (Tue Dec 21, 3:48 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, tim hall, (Mon Dec 20, 2:04 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Joe Hartley, (Mon Dec 20, 3:48 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Lee Revell, (Sun Dec 19, 11:40 pm)
[linux-audio-user] Re: in tune - stupid thread, Douglas Ward, (Thu Dec 23, 2:01 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Anderson, (Mon Dec 20, 6:29 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Russell Hanaghan, (Mon Dec 20, 4:16 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Check, (Tue Dec 21, 7:25 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Joe Hartley, (Mon Dec 20, 1:26 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki, (Mon Dec 20, 7:28 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Russell Hanaghan, (Mon Dec 20, 4:21 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Lee Revell, (Mon Dec 20, 1:47 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Christoph Eckert, (Mon Dec 20, 12:16 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Anderson, (Mon Dec 20, 6:29 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Check, (Tue Dec 21, 7:24 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Dave Robillard, (Mon Dec 20, 5:52 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Lee Revell, (Mon Dec 20, 6:26 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, John Check, (Tue Dec 21, 7:23 am)
Re: [linux-audio-user] in tune - stupid thread, Jan Depner, (Mon Dec 20, 12:28 am)