Re: [linux-audio-user] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc3-mm3-xxx

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: A list for linux audio users <linux-audio-user@...>
Date: Monday, October 11, 2004 - 3:08 pm

Florian Schmidt wrote:

Sure. I understand the basic picture. I don't see any of these
kernels as 'stable' but rather a way to address issues we run into at
given times.

I guess that without really saying it, and understanding that audio
does not drive every single requirement on this set of machines, it
makes me wonder if we wouldn't be better off as a group to have a
current 'LAU testing configuration' for the group of us that wants and
needs this stuff? If we all tested the same kernel and the same patches,
wouldn't our inputs back to lkml be possibly more relavant?

For instance, someone paying attention to lkml would post a specific
configuration via an LAU web page every so often. (1/week? 1/month?
etc...) We as a group would build it ourselves and then report back
results here. One of us would collect together the results (if required)
and report back.

I'm just sensing that everyone doing their own thing makes it harder
to know why things happen.

- Mark

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [linux-audio-user] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc3-mm3-xxx, Florian Schmidt, (Mon Oct 11, 2:53 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc3-mm3-xxx, Mark Knecht, (Mon Oct 11, 3:08 pm)
Re: [linux-audio-user] voluntary-preempt-2.6.9-rc3-mm3-xxx, Florian Schmidt, (Mon Oct 11, 9:47 am)