linuxaudio.org

Guy Daniel CLOTILDE wrote:
> Daniel James wrote / a écrit:

quoted text
>

>>In the case of music, if someone wanted to distribute a CC'd licenced

>>piece commercially, paying the artist a fair cut, then all they'd

>>have to do is contact the artist in the usual way and work out a

>>deal. What's wrong with that?

>

>

> stepping inside... There's nothing wrong, but if it costs something (again, nothing wrong) then it's not... free. I think that's what Frank was pointing out.

RMS would disagree.
you may charge for distributions - he founded GNU on the proceeds of

charging for GNU Emacs.
the point is not free as in beer, its free as in freedom.
m~
-- 
        |\      _,,,---,,_

  ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_     HTTP 503: Too Busy

       |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'

     '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are

subtle and will piss on your computer."

-- Bruce Graham
Musicians say No to RIAA Persecution and Prosecution of Music Lovers!
Sign the petition at http://www.copyleftmedia.org.uk/justsayno/
  .::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.