Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-tuning@...>
Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009 - 9:21 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

This is related to your BIOS or motherboard. Do you have the same
problem with a vanilla 2.6.29?

Since I only did reboots, I just performed a shutdown to check and it
powers off just fine. I don't use any boot options (only "root=xx quiet
ro") on this dual-core intel.
Why shut-down, anyway? s2ram and s2disk work fine with 2.6.29-rt1. I'm
very very happy (-:

>> And I have seen it hung (hard) the whole machine where a normal kernel

I did not have those for a long time (~2years), previously I experienced
hard lockups when using wifi (iwl3945) and rtirq.

I dare say there's no way to debug that - but you should ask that on
rt-linux list. There's ways to tweak things in /proc/sys/kernel/sched_*
if this lock-up is caused by a runaway process.

It could also be CPU overheating, but then the problem should also occur
with non realtime kernels as well.

robin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAknL8bAACgkQeVUk8U+VK0KoCgCggXU8WvZhiy36i0NtagBy4nqw
lroAoKHWWMBmZP9w5VUY+WJXY1rNs5BM
=B1qh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-tuning mailing list
Linux-audio-tuning@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-tuning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Linux-audio-tuning] New Linux-audio-tuning mailing list, Daniel James, (Tue Jul 29, 11:43 am)
[LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Maurizio De Cecco, (Fri Sep 12, 1:20 pm)
[LAT] RT patch not needed for new kernels (?), Grammostola Rosea, (Wed Nov 26, 11:07 pm)
[LAT] Fwd: [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt..., Lars-Erik Helander, (Mon Feb 2, 7:36 pm)
[LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Thu Mar 26, 6:52 pm)
Re: [LAT] Setting up a performance synth, Brian Bergstrom, (Thu Jan 14, 6:17 pm)
Re: [LAT] To much latency, Jeremy Jongepier, (Thu Nov 3, 8:22 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Thu Mar 26, 8:40 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Thu Mar 26, 9:21 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Fri Mar 27, 5:23 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, , (Fri Mar 27, 7:09 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Fri Mar 27, 5:27 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, , (Fri Mar 27, 12:57 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Fri Mar 27, 12:59 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Grammostola Rosea, (Fri Mar 27, 1:02 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, , (Thu Mar 26, 8:13 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Thu Mar 26, 8:30 pm)
Re: [LAT] [LAU] RT patch not needed for new kernels (?), Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Wed Nov 26, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Robin Gareus, (Mon Sep 15, 5:00 pm)
Re: [LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Daniel James, (Tue Sep 16, 9:36 am)
Re: [LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Jaromír Mikeš, (Wed Sep 17, 10:36 pm)
Re: [LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Robin Gareus, (Thu Sep 18, 2:47 pm)
Re: [LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Jaromír Mikeš, (Thu Sep 18, 7:42 pm)
Re: [LAT] Tickless kernel and realtime, Emanuel Rumpf, (Sun Sep 14, 12:38 pm)