Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Daniel James <daniel@...>, Tapani <tapani.raikkonen@...>, Lista de colaboradores de Musix <musix-colaborad@...>, Alexandre Oliva <lxoliva@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-tuning@...>, Free Ekanayaka <free@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 6, 2008 - 8:53 am

El Martes, 5 de Agosto de 2008 12:11, Daniel James escribió:
| Hi Marcos,
|
| > We are now testing:
| >
| > linux-image-2.6.26-libre - Linux kernel binary image for version
| > 2.6.26-libre
| >
| > but it's not yet realtime patched.
|

Now, it's realtime

http://linux.ilmainen.net/musix/temp/realtime/

| I'd be interested to know how you get on with that kernel.

Alexandre Oliva builds the *libre kernels (without
the Linux blobs)

Tapani Räikkönen builds the Musix
kernels from there.

We are testing the *libre kernels. There are no problems with them,
but, because Musix is a Live CD-DVD distro, we need aufs and we could
not build the kernel using the realtime patches+aufs, for now.

Alexandre and Tapani are trying it, maybe Free could help, I dont
know, maybe we all could work together.

This mailing list should be good?

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-tuning

We are not using squashfs for now, because knoppix does not use it
(but in the short future, that's possible).

| Perhaps
| we can arrive at a shared config or even binaries that all
| Debian-derived multimedia distros can use.

Well: that's possible, we use Debian ETCH for now, so all the kernel
headers will work fine on ETCH. But we will move on the near future,
I think.

| I know of four based on
| Debian - Musix, 64 Studio, Ubuntu Studio and Pure:Dyne, but there
| may be others.

Artistix...?

| Plus there are the users of regular Debian who need
| an RT kernel.
|

Yes, there are some kernels from Musix that they/you can use

# Musix GNU+Linux (stable+backports) /etc/apt/sources.list
#deb ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/deb/ ./

Also, Gilberto Borges included a function on the musixcontrol panel to
make a realtime enabled Debian distro from any debian based distro.

ftp://musix.ourproject.org/pub/musix/deb/painelmusix-1.7_i386.deb

| Are you doing anything with Debian Lenny yet?

No: just SID: testing SID to see what happens :), but we are not
focused on SID for now, we are just happy with ETCH, backporting some
packages (ardour and so), so it's not necessary to upgrade to lenny
or sid for now

| Our experience is
| that it's not really stable enough to recommend to users, so our
| main concern is to solve multimedia package bugs. There is no
| Ardour in Lenny, for instance.
|

I did not knew that! that's odd!

| > We at Argentina are introducing FOSS Musix GNU+Linux on music
| > schools; for now, the experience is great!
|
| I recently wrote an article about using GNU/Linux in a school
| music club, and because of that I was asked to help with
| music-related information for http://www.schoolforge.net/
|

Great! this web page is cool

What is exactly the article's URL

Regards

--
Marcos Guglielmetti - www.foros.musix.es | Soporte comunitario

"Si no se tiene el coraje de vivir como se piensa se termina pensando
cómo se vive."

Victoria Ocampo
-----------------------------------------------
Blog personal: www.marcospcmusica.wordpress.com

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-tuning mailing list
Linux-audio-tuning@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-tuning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAT] Hello, Gilberto Borges, (Wed Jul 30, 9:39 pm)
[LAT] Hyper Threading, Jaromír Mikeš, (Wed Sep 17, 10:43 pm)
[LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?, james of jwm-art net, (Tue Dec 2, 5:53 pm)
Re: [LAT] [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;..., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Feb 2, 11:08 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 28, 1:18 pm)
[LAT] RT kernel for audio and dynamic vs static ticks, Lars-Erik Helander, (Mon Jan 18, 12:50 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Sat Mar 28, 6:11 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Ray Rashif, (Wed Apr 8, 2:54 am)
Re: [LAT] [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: &gt;..., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Tue Feb 3, 6:11 pm)
Re: [LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?, Daniel James, (Wed Dec 3, 11:17 am)
Re: [LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?, james of jwm-art net, (Wed Dec 3, 3:29 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hyper Threading, Robin Gareus, (Thu Sep 18, 2:53 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hyper Threading, Jaromír Mikeš, (Thu Sep 18, 7:45 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hello, Andy Farnell, (Wed Jul 30, 10:00 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hello, Marcos Guglielmetti, (Wed Jul 30, 11:00 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hello, Daniel James, (Tue Aug 5, 3:12 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels, Marcos Guglielmetti, (Wed Aug 6, 8:53 am)
Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels, Robin Gareus, (Thu Aug 7, 5:05 pm)
Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels, Marcos Guglielmetti, (Wed Aug 6, 3:36 pm)