Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Robin Gareus <robin@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-tuning@...>
Date: Friday, August 22, 2008 - 3:51 pm

Hi Robin,
> more concrete: I think we should follow the kernel.org sign-off strategy

Sounds good - linuxaudio.org as the authoritative source? :-)

> Here are two starting points: http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/kernel/

Thanks for putting those together.

> Are there intention for a [regular] /meeting/ (IRC)?

I don't think we need that yet, unless a formal team is organised. I
could be wrong about that though ;-)

Cheers!

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-tuning mailing list
Linux-audio-tuning@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-tuning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAT] 2.6 stable, Robin Gareus, (Tue Aug 19, 5:41 am)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, aymeric mansoux, (Tue Aug 19, 3:36 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, Daniel James, (Wed Aug 20, 9:06 am)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, aymeric mansoux, (Thu Aug 21, 1:52 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, Robin Gareus, (Thu Aug 21, 4:41 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, Daniel James, (Fri Aug 22, 3:51 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, aymeric mansoux, (Fri Aug 22, 4:33 pm)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, Robin Gareus, (Sat Aug 23, 11:20 am)
Re: [LAT] 2.6 stable, Free Ekanayaka, (Sun Aug 24, 7:36 am)