Re: [LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-tuning@...>

Subject: Re: [LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?

Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 - 3:29 pm

Hi Daniel,
Thanks. I found the other information and am now using the 2.6.26.6 rt

patched kernel. So far its working, but I've only got as far as

building JACK :-)
Here's to waiting for the official lenny release!
Cheers,

James.
On 3/12/2008, "Daniel James"  wrote:
>Hi James,

quoted text>

>> I'm using a coverdisc of debian lenny as a minimal base system + xorg +

>> fluxbox (can't stomache gnome dependancies), am wondering if maybe a

>> better choice might be had, regarding development libraries included in

>> an ISO which would satisfy dependancies for building the s/w most

>> important (like ardour2.7, etc etc)?

>

>Lenny isn't a bad choice, but it's still a work in progress. We haven't

>produced a Lenny version of 64 Studio yet, that will have to wait for

>the official Lenny release.

>

>Cheers!

>

>Daniel

>

_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-tuning mailing list

Linux-audio-tuning@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-tuning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAT] Hello, Gilberto Borges, (Wed Jul 30, 9:39 pm)

[LAT] Hyper Threading, Jaromír Mikeš, (Wed Sep 17, 10:43 pm)

[LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?, james of jwm-art net, (Tue Dec 2, 5:53 pm)

Re: [LAT] [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >..., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Mon Feb 2, 11:08 pm)

Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Robin Gareus, (Sat Mar 28, 1:18 pm)

[LAT] RT kernel for audio and dynamic vs static ticks, Lars-Erik Helander, (Mon Jan 18, 12:50 pm)

[LAT] scheduled server downtime - 10/Jan/12 - linuxaudio.org, Robin Gareus, (Tue Jan 10, 3:26 pm)

Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Sat Mar 28, 6:11 pm)

Re: [LAT] 2.6.29-rt1, Ray Rashif, (Wed Apr 8, 2:54 am)

Re: [LAT] [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >..., dieeasy, (Tue Feb 3, 3:04 pm)

Re: [LAT] [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >..., Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, (Tue Feb 3, 6:11 pm)

Re: [LAT] [LAU] Are RT-patches needed anymore? (Was Re: >..., dieeasy, (Wed Feb 4, 8:42 am)

Re: [LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?, Daniel James, (Wed Dec 3, 11:17 am)

Re: [LAT] amd64: kernels? base system?, james of jwm-art net, (Wed Dec 3, 3:29 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hyper Threading, Robin Gareus, (Thu Sep 18, 2:53 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hyper Threading, Jaromír Mikeš, (Thu Sep 18, 7:45 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hello, Andy Farnell, (Wed Jul 30, 10:00 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hello, Marcos Guglielmetti, (Wed Jul 30, 11:00 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hello, Daniel James, (Tue Aug 5, 3:12 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels, Marcos Guglielmetti, (Wed Aug 6, 8:53 am)

Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels, Robin Gareus, (Thu Aug 7, 5:05 pm)

Re: [LAT] Hello / kernels, Marcos Guglielmetti, (Wed Aug 6, 3:36 pm)