Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Fons Adriaensen <fons@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Saturday, June 28, 2014 - 11:50 am

Am 25.06.2014 23:10, schrieb Fons Adriaensen:

Because I try to do the Open Source Community a pleasure and wont be the
devils advocate.
You say that a part of my work leads you to avoid to release OpenSource
(GPL'd), that is a thing which I ever tried to avoid. It hurts me to
hear that I may be fallen therewith.

>> Truly, you have made a great contribution to the Open Source World

I remember the discussion about the Hadarmard matrix function in 2010 at
faust devel list. This one was as well about the zita-rev1
implementation in faust.
As well you seems to be pleased with the faust zita-rev1 implementation
at this time and helped Julius with some hints.

>> and which is distributed under the GPL within the faust distribution.

Al the discussion here imply exactly the opposite, . .

>

I, didn't call anything here, as I have stated out before. It is, the
faust implementation, which is implement in faust as zita-rev1. Because
we use it as it is, we use the name of the implementation as it is. But,
the "and make it look like a 1950s piece of vintage gear", I take as a
compliment, because that is indeed what we will reach. :-)

I understand, you didn't like it, but, that is a matter of taste. I
didn't like how zita-rev1 looks in your original version, that the way
it is, different people, different taste.

As pointed out earlier, I always try to don't act in this way, that's
why I have contacted you several times before we start to use
zita-convolver and zita-resampler in our project, I've reported the
problems we've had to you, and ask for advice and permission to
implement it at is best.

There is no way for me to see that you are un-pleased with the faust
implementation of zita-rev1, nor that you wouldn’t see any
implementation of it in other projects.
What the hell do you expect when you tell here we do
"cherry-picking without respect for the original author's intentions and
in fact subverting those"

As, well, cherry-picking, we didn't only pick those, we give them also
back in form of contributions to the source code of faust, so, please,

> Creativity is not just the ability to copy.

Thanks for this tip.

by
hermann
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, Etienne Rouge, (Mon Jun 23, 6:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 4:05 am)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, Etienne Rouge, (Wed Jun 25, 12:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 12:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jun 25, 12:56 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 1:10 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jun 25, 1:34 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 2:08 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jun 25, 3:18 pm)
[LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 6:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Fons Adriaensen, (Wed Jun 25, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Sat Jun 28, 11:50 am)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Jun 29, 3:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Sun Jun 29, 5:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Jun 30, 10:43 am)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Mon Jun 30, 1:25 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Mon Jun 30, 2:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Jun 30, 3:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Ralf Mardorf, (Mon Jun 30, 8:10 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Mon Jun 30, 4:25 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Jun 30, 6:19 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Mon Jun 30, 7:09 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Mon Jun 30, 6:39 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Paul Davis, (Sun Jun 29, 10:53 pm)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, hermann meyer, (Mon Jun 30, 3:53 am)
Re: [LAD] Open Source to be or not to be?, Neil C Smith, (Wed Jun 25, 10:13 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 4:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 4:54 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, Philipp , (Wed Jun 25, 3:09 pm)
Re: [LAD] The modular audio chronicles ep. 1, hermann meyer, (Wed Jun 25, 3:40 pm)