Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, April 11, 2013 - 6:23 pm

On 04/08/2013 01:51 PM, Harry van Haaren wrote:

hmmm. isn't that a really outdated way of saying "generic pointer", like
C89 or so? maybe the ringbuffer implementation should be changed to
(void *)?
or am i misunderstanding something?

--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Lortzingstr. 11, 45128 Essen, Tel. +49 177 7937487

Meister für Veranstaltungstechnik (Bühne/Studio)
Tonmeister VDT

http://stackingdwarves.net

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Mon Apr 8, 11:45 am)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Harry van Haaren, (Mon Apr 8, 11:51 am)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Apr 11, 6:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Mon Apr 8, 12:02 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Harry van Haaren, (Mon Apr 8, 12:09 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Mon Apr 8, 12:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Paul Davis, (Mon Apr 8, 1:29 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Mon Apr 8, 3:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Thu Apr 11, 9:35 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Fri Apr 12, 8:17 am)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Adrian Knoth, (Mon Apr 8, 12:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Mon Apr 8, 1:16 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Adrian Knoth, (Mon Apr 8, 1:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Raphaël BOLLEN, (Mon Apr 8, 3:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer usage, Adrian Knoth, (Mon Apr 8, 3:48 pm)