linuxaudio.org

--e89a8f2346bd9d81a704d7bf1629

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tim E. Real  wrote:
> lance, but slightly different levels, but not a true 'stereo pan'.

quoted text
>

> But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo pan' feature.

>

first, terminology. just as when describing track or bus I/O configuration,

"mono" and 'stereo" just doesn't really work very well.
simpler to describe things in terms of number of inputs and number of

outputs.
with 1 input to 1 output: no panning

1 input to 2 output: simple panning

2 inputs to 2 outputs:  ....
in this last case you have to consider the desired "width" of the signal,

as well as possible phase relationships between the 2 inputs. in many

scenarios it would be technically wrong to ever sent the "L" input to the

"R" speaker and vice versa, but in others it may be ok. and the user might

want it to be ok in every case.
etc.
--e89a8f2346bd9d81a704d7bf1629

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Tim E. =

Real <termtech@rogers.com> wrote:

lance, but slightly different levels, but not a true 'stereo pan'.<=

br>
But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo pan&#3=

9; feature.first, terminology. just as when descr=

ibing track or bus I/O configuration, "mono" and 'stereo&quot=

; just doesn't really work very well.

simpler to describe things in terms of number of inputs and number of o=

utputs.with 1 input to 1 output: no panning1 input to 2 output:=

 simple panning2 inputs to 2 outputs:=A0 ....in this last case =

you have to consider the desired "width" of the signal, as well a=

s possible phase relationships between the 2 inputs. in many scenarios it w=

ould be technically wrong to ever sent the "L" input to the &quot=

;R" speaker and vice versa, but in others it may be ok. and the user m=

ight want it to be ok in every case.

etc.=A0
--e89a8f2346bd9d81a704d7bf1629--