Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Sunday, March 10, 2013 - 2:01 pm

Le Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:56:39 +0100,
Ralf Mardorf a écrit :

> On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 12:35 +0100, Dominique Michel wrote:

It is enough if they provide a source tarball. Beside the sources, all
that gentoo need is a script called ebuild. This ebuild is used by
portage to download, decompress and compile the sources, as well
than to install the program. I guess than, like with most proprietary
software, we will never get the sources... Unfortunately, software like
the ati and nvidia drivers are exceptions, not the rule, with
proprietary software.

Using gentoo was, for me, the result of many years with GNU/Linux. I
try/used many other distributions, and if they are easier to install,
a gentoo successful install will work and will be definitely easier
to manage on the long run, especially when, like many of us, I am using
multiple repositories (overlays for gentoo).

That said, I never try arch. What I know is that arch do have an
outstanding wiki.

The main gentoo disadvantage is that compiling every thing can be very
stressing for the hardware. You will need good quality hdd and RAM on
the long run. Also, using a rt kernel with portage is not recommended,
this can lead to very strange bugs. This is why I am using the
gentoo-sources kernel with rt enabled trough cgroups. An alternative is
to use one kernel with portage and the rt kernel for audio work.

Dominique

--
"We have the heroes we deserve."
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Dave Phillips, (Wed Mar 6, 12:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Mar 8, 7:58 am)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Adrian Knoth, (Wed Mar 6, 1:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Mar 8, 8:04 am)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Thijs van severen, (Fri Mar 8, 9:58 am)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Mar 8, 1:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Louigi Verona, (Fri Mar 8, 7:14 pm)
[LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Mar 8, 8:32 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Louigi Verona, (Sat Mar 9, 4:56 am)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Mar 9, 4:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, William Light, (Sun Mar 10, 3:05 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Dominique Michel, (Sun Mar 10, 11:36 am)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Mar 10, 11:56 am)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Dominique Michel, (Sun Mar 10, 2:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Sun Mar 10, 5:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Louigi Verona, (Sat Mar 9, 6:40 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Sat Mar 9, 7:58 pm)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Louigi Verona, (Sun Mar 10, 6:46 am)
Re: [LAD] OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Tim E. Real, (Fri Mar 8, 9:37 pm)
[LAD] Muse - Was: OT: Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Ralf Mardorf, (Fri Mar 8, 10:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Paul Davis, (Wed Mar 6, 2:23 pm)
Re: [LAD] Bitwig beta for Linux reviewed, Harry van Haaren, (Wed Mar 6, 12:12 pm)