linuxaudio.org

On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 18:45:15 -0500

David Robillard  wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 23:44 +0100, Alex Stone wrote:

quoted text
> [...]

> > As a user of NSM, and from that user perspective, it does what it says

> > on the tin. It's user friendly, and helps administer the process of

> > starting up my large sessions with no rocket science involved.

> >

> > Given the strong wills, and previous scorch marks in the ML about

> > session management, i have no desire to light a match here, but for

> > the simple task of starting a succession of apps in a session, NSM

> > does its job well, imho.

> >

> > How much code is required in apps to enable them for NSM use?

> >

> > Is there an appetite for at least one session management app that does

> > the simple stuff well that users can become familiar with as a

> > "linuxaudio" basic default, as a "unified" community protocol

> > agreement, without descending into hades and a flame war, in the

> > interest of taking the community forward, and giving users a better

> > experience?

>

> Oh boy, *this*, again.

>

> In retrospect, replying to this thread at all is surely the dumbest

> thing I will do today.  Nevermind.

Which means the person who started the thread must surely be the

dumbest person on earth, or something.
Could you elaborate please: why is compatibility between the existing

session management systems a dumb idea? Is it because if something

would work together in the Linux audio world in a reasonable way,

there would be danger of somebody actually using it? Please enlighten

me.
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev