Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Nils Gey <ich@...>
Cc: <Linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Saturday, February 23, 2013 - 10:44 pm

On 23 February 2013 23:22, Nils Gey wrote:

As a user of NSM, and from that user perspective, it does what it says
on the tin. It's user friendly, and helps administer the process of
starting up my large sessions with no rocket science involved.

Given the strong wills, and previous scorch marks in the ML about
session management, i have no desire to light a match here, but for
the simple task of starting a succession of apps in a session, NSM
does its job well, imho.

How much code is required in apps to enable them for NSM use?

Is there an appetite for at least one session management app that does
the simple stuff well that users can become familiar with as a
"linuxaudio" basic default, as a "unified" community protocol
agreement, without descending into hades and a flame war, in the
interest of taking the community forward, and giving users a better
experience?

Alex
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] Interoperability between session management systems, Johannes Kroll, (Sat Feb 23, 4:01 pm)
Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems, David Robillard, (Sat Feb 23, 11:36 pm)
Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems, Alex Stone, (Sat Feb 23, 10:44 pm)
Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems, David Robillard, (Sat Feb 23, 11:45 pm)
Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems, Roy Vegard Ovesen, (Sun Feb 24, 10:58 am)