linuxaudio.org

--=-QRamEAwmc352S6ZvJEwa

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 10:22 -0700, Sean Bolton wrote:

quoted text
> Hi Dave,

>=20

> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:43:27 -0400 David Robillard

> wrote:

> > Originally I was thinking about a

> > control to set the base frequency, but it sounds like you are

> > thinking about adding a Hz frequency CV port.  This is a better idea,

> > since you get both options, and the debate goes away entirely.  The

> > overhead is about 2 multiplications per sample, so not really an

> > issue.

>=20

> Careful there.  You will find that to get the 1/oct modulation to work,

> you'll need a calculation somewhat like this:

>=20

> frequency =3D exp2(octave_mod_port + log2(Hz_port))

>=20

> which in light of this overlong discussion, makes me laugh out

> loud!

... the calculation is not the issue, the interface is.
-dr
--=-QRamEAwmc352S6ZvJEwa

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAABCAAGBQJQNRjvAAoJEDZyeCqb82jzqysQAOq+v01jsRqTt50NCPajXXpr

neLfQaTt+rNZGwafcSchEKnT8fqkOWMu9B/DF/0BzeweX3hP0W9kNxWrXGh+K059

BR5pLrHk6jb+1wF+HD9M0pqY5iYKkW2/x7w+RFfSbtwhj8bY2COKRqWenfn3BB5t

gDgBIcaS1S8tIGzGwAGvpZ6wiuDteDU6pYNYVIH9auM2MXXrBTU1xsW8ykcbnCrH

Kx6h7sJot/o3vqydzUlKHzwfddBycSVaFMSpcsWmSPFDAzDBa3S9rTrvJsMcdYxJ

pgocDuAF/skT3DiVUAd3NRKyqRNsQx9UdAng4ldZkjwBYioQA5uLKyKT3tzgx/hi

bN+ooT3ZPdPsaMXhKNthsYDYCu8mhSoJsFHo3Qm0Uj62u+HbMAyPJR9gdpPMbyR5

iu84f38di6ROeTLvV/9p9Sk98k1ZCtT2mGEfCRZiS5zrzjCwvm1XmsbKC+yASaUx

Prhi0ztD2IWM5K70KvaiNL5sYouR2Pr61Mq7XTsmfhHFMkWoTChn3Vbh0mc085Su

P/kxmi8CxYwA6CbSNZBc9Go+CcnpmImKy1H4YBPUHpAUQNxlt4VGZyJ2tv1+fa7x

yVUHUt251RZgaFNXwim2wUYbVG1HAjjDmcOGkjJIH+T+lWNJFLCvLlwsIaP09gTK

Ea39G0b2nGh96qdZzjTr

=kKuD

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-QRamEAwmc352S6ZvJEwa--