On 08/22/2012 01:50 AM, David Robillard wrote:
I would prefer 1), because 1/octave might be useful for modulation, but
just complicates matters if the task at hand is setting an oscillator to
a specific frequency.
One could even argue that oscillators should not have 1/octave ports at
all, but that there should be a plugin that takes a 1/octave modulation
input, a Hz base input and delivers a resulting Hz output. The DRY
principal applied to plugins.
Even for modulation, a plugin/infrastructure that allows the user to map
any value range to a frequency modulation range in semitones could be
far friendlier and does not necessarily need 1/octave behind the scenes.
I doubt consistency with the original plugins will matter in practice at
all. The added workload for you sucks, of course and only you can weight
that aspect of it, David.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.