On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 22:56 +0000, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Yes.
> Isn't the LV2 way to do this via features (i.e. the plugin
Yes, this callback is in a feature struct. Essentially "feature" just
means "thing provided by the host"[1].
Restrictions would also be features, but nevermind that. Regardless of
restrictions, plugins need to know the actual situation (for example,
right now I need to know max, and have no restrictions). It decomposes
nicely.
Not mentioning any of that was no mistake[2]; I am attempting to farm
precisely one piece of information: whether or not the above callback
can adequately express any reasonable block length situation; i.e.
whether or not any plugin could know "yes, I can run" or "no, my
requirements to run are not met".
There is no point confusing the thread with restrictions since that part
follows directly from the above.
Also, I said something stupid about constant size earlier. Of course,
constant can be expressed with min == max.
-dr
[1] Poor choice in terminology here, it turns out
[2] I know this stupid list and how to extract useful information from
it and ignore the rest ;)
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.