Re: [LAD] Plugin buffer size restrictions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 - 11:18 am

On 05/29/2012 01:03 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote:

The graphical environment would lead to the expectation that control
points in the automation editor and the waveform view are strictly in
one timeline, no delay.

It should be possible and provided for, that parts of automation
recorded live and parts created graphically are mixed and also that
recorded automation will be edited.

I guess that would mean that an automation editor has to show the result
of the control values, not the values themselves. So on playback, the
automation would be send with negative delay (requiring latency on the
"Play" command ...)

--
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] Plugin buffer size restrictions, Jeff McClintock, (Mon May 28, 10:07 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin buffer size restrictions, David Robillard, (Tue May 29, 3:27 am)
Re: [LAD] Plugin buffer size restrictions, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon May 28, 11:03 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin buffer size restrictions, Thorsten Wilms, (Tue May 29, 11:18 am)