linuxaudio.org

Am Sonntag, den 29.04.2012, 15:44 -0500 schrieb Jan Depner:

quoted text
> On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 11:07 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:

> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:41 AM, hermann  wrote:

> >

> > > Is anyone here on the list knowing what is to do now, what could we do

> > > to make the provider aware that he must offer the source in the same way

> > > then the binary's,

> >

> > this part is not quite true. its generally accepted that as long as

> > the source is freel available from an identifiable online location,

> > then notifying people who received the binaries of their rights and

> > the location from which the source can be obtained is sufficient *if

> > there are no modifications*

>

> I agree with Paul.  He's got all of the included package's web site

> links on his web site.  If you want to duplicate what he's done you can

> just jump to all of those links, get all the source code, and build it

> yourself.  Thirty bucks doesn't sound like too high a price to avoid the

> headaches though (assuming it works ;-)

>

> Jan

> 

The link list is far away from "all".

eg.: libs, kernel, etc.

The price is not in question. But I think, if one use GPL'd software

commercial, the distributor must make sure that the source is available

to the users, I mean the complete source here.

This stick is a bit more then a bundle of applications were a link to

some project site will suite the requirements of the GPL. 
hermann   
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev