linuxaudio.org

On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 00:55 +0100, Albert Graef wrote:

[...]

quoted text
> Anyway, Paul, I understand that you have plenty of other important stuff

> on your TODO list for Ardour3. I'm not complaining. The reason that I

> brought up Ardour in this context was that I seem to recall reading

> something on the Ardour website, about Ardour3 already having the right

> infrastructure which would make it easy to add some kind of OSC tracks.

> Maybe I've misread that remark, though.

I probably said this.  Internally it's like Jack in most of the

important places, i.e. the actual type of the event payload is pretty

much irrelevant.  The biggest problem to solve is the on-disk format.
Control data (i.e. "automation") in Ardour is its own thing, not even

really MIDI related.  I co-opted the existing automation system as much

as possible deliberately for this reason.  It could be made to *send*

OSC messages for curves pretty easily.
It would be nice if this integrated with stuff in the plugin sphere, but

I've come to the conclusion that, unfortunately, OSC is more trouble

than it's worth there (though nothing is stopping anyone from using it).

After countless attempts at achieving a decent more-powerful-than-MIDI

mechanism, I've come to this opinion:
Give me a simple data model based on primitives, lists, and dictionaries

any day over some clunky command-like message format.
To me, the easy integration that gives you (with e.g. the dictionary

built in to pretty much every programming language ever, Turtle, JSON

(and thus webby everything), key:value stores), the 'meaningfulness', a

standard string serialisation, and an easy ability to describe

arbitrarily complex things via nesting, is of infinitely more value than

integrating with the tiny nichey collection of things that support OSC.
Maybe it's just that I've tried to do some pretty advanced things on top

of OSC (like 100% of GUI<=>engine control), but it's just a little too

half-assed for my tastes these days.
That said, I'm fully behind anything that would provide the individual

note control and high controller precision that MIDI can't.
-dr
_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev