Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Thursday, March 22, 2012 - 9:51 pm

On 03/22/2012 10:27 PM, David Robillard wrote:

If it is decided that this the course to take, would it not be better to
attribute a version number to the whole snapshot that meets normal
version numbering conventions rather than a date?

Downstream distros wanting to use a git snapshot can still do so by way
of there package release number. ie 2.x-0.1.git1A2B3CF

>

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 3:48 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Albert Graef, (Thu Mar 22, 6:42 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 9:12 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Paul Davis, (Thu Mar 22, 6:48 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 9:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Albert Graef, (Thu Mar 22, 10:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 11:44 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Albert Graef, (Fri Mar 23, 7:09 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Fons Adriaensen, (Thu Mar 22, 10:19 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 11:31 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Brendan Jones, (Thu Mar 22, 9:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Thu Mar 22, 9:57 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, Chris Goddard, (Thu Mar 22, 10:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 specification packaging, David Robillard, (Tue Mar 27, 2:13 am)