Re: [LAD] LV2 implementer poll (event buffer)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <linux-audio-dev@...>

Subject: Re: [LAD] LV2 implementer poll (event buffer)

Date: Monday, February 6, 2012 - 5:26 pm

On 02/06/2012 12:43 AM, David Robillard wrote:

quoted text

> If anyone has any other gripes/suggestions for the event extension,
> now's the time to make them heard. Speak now or forever hold your
> peace, etc.

AFAICT I don't use any of the items that you mentioned.

> P.S. I have avoided the "why does event need to be replaced" part to

quoted text

> keep it to the point, but if anyone is curious, I can explain

I'm curious. :)

Albert

--
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email: Dr.Graef@t-online.de, ag@muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[LAD] LV2 implementer poll (event buffer), David Robillard, (Sun Feb 5, 11:43 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 implementer poll (event buffer), Albert Graef, (Mon Feb 6, 5:26 pm)

Re: [LAD] LV2 implementer poll (event buffer), David Robillard, (Mon Feb 6, 6:42 pm)