Re: [LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Monday, February 6, 2012 - 11:04 am

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:33:31AM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:

> what i want to avoid is a ramp from default or previous values whenever

For general purpose processing (as opposed to synthesis) that doesn't
matter in practice. Certainly not if the ramp is just one period.

> can i rely on control port data being available during activate() so

This would be outside the main loop, so harmless. You may want something
similar to switch between interpolated or constant runs as well, so it
would just add one boolean.

Note that making parameter smoothing dependent on the period size
is not really recommended, except again for synthesis. For the zita
series it is Verboten.

--
FA

Vor uns liegt ein weites Tal, die Sonne scheint - ein Glitzerstrahl.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Feb 6, 9:33 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation, Gabriel M. Beddingfield, (Mon Feb 6, 1:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Feb 6, 4:49 pm)
Re: [LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Feb 6, 11:04 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation, Jörn Nettingsmeier, (Mon Feb 6, 11:55 am)
Re: [LAD] LV2 and parameter interpolation, David Robillard, (Mon Feb 6, 6:46 pm)