Re: [LAD] memory allocation for the real time thread, opinions wanted

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: James Morris <james@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 - 9:34 pm

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:43 PM, James Morris wrote:

[Mass snippage]

I suppose the semaphore isn't strictly necessary, but I think it's an
easy way to tell the main thread that it has a message to process.
Although one that probably doesn't integrate well with most
main/non-RT threads.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] memory allocation for the real time thread, opinio..., Paul Coccoli, (Tue Feb 28, 9:34 pm)