Re: [LAD] memory allocation for the real time thread, opinions wanted

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 - 1:44 am

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:01:18 -0500
Paul Coccoli wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Fons Adriaensen

That's what I thought... would be better for someone who is new to real
time threads and memory allocation... and is what I decided on... minus
the semaphore.

So why is a semaphore needed? If the RT thread only sends an item back
when it absolutely no longer will use it?

James.

> _______________________________________________

--
http://jwm-art.net/
image/audio/text/code/

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] memory allocation for the real time thread, opinio..., James Morris, (Tue Feb 28, 1:44 am)