Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Filipe Lopes <falktx@...>
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Subject: Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs
Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 - 1:28 pm

--0015175cd826c68f4404b9796156

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1


You can take the latest git by using:

git clone git://distrho.git.sf.net/gitroot/distrho/distrho --depth 1


but I don't but I recommend it right now. The current build system

(premake) uses static build flags, and would require a lot of manual

editing to set it differently.

one of my targets once I get everything working with the latest juce-git is

to port the build system to cmake. when that happens it will be much easier

to compile the plugins.

(juce itself is not needed, it pre-included in the repo - and has custom

patches)


Did you also tested the loomer plugins? how do they behave compared to the

disthro ports?


On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Dave Phillips wrote:


>  On 02/21/2012 07:46 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:


--0015175cd826c68f4404b9796156

Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


You can take the latest git by using:git clone git://distrho.git.sf.net/gitroo=

t/distrho/distrho --depth 1but I don't but I recomme=

nd it right now. The current build system (premake) uses static build flags=

, and would require a lot of manual editing to set it differently.

one of my targets once I get everything working with the latest juce-git is=

 to port the build system to cmake. when that happens it will be much easie=

r to compile the plugins.(juce itself is not needed, it pre-included in=

 the repo - and has custom patches)

Did you also tested the loomer plugins? how do they behave compared to =

the disthro ports?On Tu=

e, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@woh.rr.com> wrote:


 =20

   =20

 =20


    On 02/21/2012 07:46 AM, Filipe Lopes wrote:

    Hey Dave,


      I've been working with juce plugins a lot recently, and one of my

      projects handles precisely that:

      http://=

distrho.sourceforge.net/


      juce has not been very linux-friendly in it's early days, and

      still has a few issues right now (but it's now much better than

      before).

      I plan to move all plugins from the old jucetice project to

      DISTRHO (which most is already done, only missing Jost).

      these changes are not yet ready though, as I'm updating all the

      plugins to the very latest juce-git modules branch, and also

      working on a serious juce-linux issue with realtime kernels.

      once everything is done, I'll post to the linuxaudio planet as

      usual (through KXStudio news)


      if you're using plugins from here:

      http:=

//www.anticore.org/jucetice/

      or

      http://=

code.google.com/p/juced/


      you'll have issues for sure. Old loomer plugins had issues too,

      but the new ones seem to work fine now.


    Hi Filipe,


    Thanks for the reply. Alas, some of the problematic plugins I tested

    were from the DISTRHO collection (specifically the TAL reverbs 2 and

    3 and the TAL vocoder. I tested the prebuilt binaries, btw. Perhaps

    a local build would be preferable ? I have the latest JUCE framework

    and the VST 2.4 SDK, on an Arch 64-bit system.


    Also, I wanted to add a "Thank you" for those ports and I hop=

e

    you're inspired to make more of them. :)


    Best,


    dp


        On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Dave Phillips &=

lt;dlphillips@wo=

h.rr.com>

        wrote:


          Greetings,


          I notice that whenever I use any Juce-based native Linux VST

          plugin - fx or instrument - in Ardour3 the plugin produces

          dramatically more xruns than any LV2 or LADSPA plug. Does

          anyone else have that problem ? If so, can anything be done

          about it, apart from raising my latency settings ?


          Thanks,


          dp


          _______________________________________________

          Linux-audio-dev mailing list

          Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

          http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev<=

br>


      _______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

L=

inux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev


_______________________________________________

Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Linux-audio-dev@lis=

ts.linuxaudio.org

http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev


--0015175cd826c68f4404b9796156--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs, Dave Phillips, (Tue Feb 21, 12:34 pm)
Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs, Filipe Lopes, (Tue Feb 21, 12:47 pm)
Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs, Dave Phillips, (Tue Feb 21, 1:09 pm)
Re: [LAD] question re: latency of native Linux VSTs, Filipe Lopes, (Tue Feb 21, 1:28 pm)