Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Robillard <d@...>
Cc: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Monday, October 22, 2012 - 11:41 am

On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 07:15:32PM -0400, David Robillard wrote:

> Well, this effort which you have so vehemently attacked was an effort to

I did not attack that effort (which I see as a good thing), nor LV2
in general.

I did 'attack'

1. Your statement (in your original post) that zero-latency convolution
requires synchronous operation and does not allow the use of threads,

2. Your statement (in a later post) that the multithreaded approach used
by zita-convolver leads to less stable and reliable systems.

Both statements are wrong, that's all there is to it.

Ciao,

--
FA

A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, David Robillard, (Sun Oct 21, 8:24 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, Fons Adriaensen, (Sun Oct 21, 9:10 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, David Robillard, (Sun Oct 21, 11:15 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Oct 22, 11:41 am)
Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, David Robillard, (Mon Oct 22, 3:27 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, Fons Adriaensen, (Mon Oct 22, 7:51 pm)
Re: [LAD] Plugin block length restrictions, David Robillard, (Tue Oct 23, 11:33 pm)