Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <linux-audio-dev@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 3:58 pm

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:07:20PM +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote:

> http://paradoxuncreated.com/Blog/wordpress/?p=2268

The site mentions:

--- quote ---

--- end quote ---

Setting the X-server to FIFO/98 is just plain wrong, at least on an
audio mailing list.

And then:

--- quotes ---

--- end quotes ---

I have no idea what you're trying to prove here, but I'm pretty sure you
have a general misunderstanding of jitter, thread wake-up latencies and
proper scheduling priorities.

--
mail: adi@thur.de http://adi.thur.de PGP/GPG: key via keyserver

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., Uwaysi Bin Kareem, (Wed Oct 17, 3:07 pm)
Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forw..., Adrian Knoth, (Wed Oct 17, 3:58 pm)