Hi Aurélien,On 01/15/2012 12:57 PM, Aurélien Leblond wrote:
thanks for getting back to me. You can find some of your answers here
[1]. If AMS is GPL V2 both licenses would be perfectly valid in your case.
Depending on which one you choose, you will need to update the license
file. The license on your project page is not really of consequence its
just confusing. I would also suggest that you add headers to all of your
source code in the event that someone derives something from your work.
regards,
Brendan
[1] http://www.ifross.org/en/what-difference-between-gplv2-and-gplv3
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
LINUX® is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the USA and other countries.
Linuxaudio.org logo copyright Thorsten Wilms © 2006.
Hosting provided by the Virginia Tech Department of Music and DISIS.